Consumers are requesting more innovation, faster delivery, and cheaper products to the market while demanding higher quality and safety standards. Hence, consumer expectations are increasing. How can you always produce the best possible quality at an affordable price? How can you avoid the risks of a recall campaign or brand damage if an adverse event is publicized?
It is fundamental to address quality from the very beginning of a product’s development and production cycle. This is mandatory for manufacturers that need to ensure “best-in-class” results and avoid costly changes in later planning or implementation stages.
How to move from market challenges to new product introduction (NPI) by avoiding threats
Let’s focus on a forward-looking approach to quality, which incorporates advanced product quality planning (APQP) methodology, a recognized best practice, especially in the automotive industry.
A new product initiates its lifecycle as a requirement by considering the “Voice of the Customer.” Integrating Quality data early in the design process can provide a competitive and cost advantage beyond other business strategies. Using sophisticated product development methods, it grows to a system, then a logical structure until being a virtual product.
As an initial step, it is important to consider the management of the new project as a starting point. Project managers must manage several activities from different domains, such as engineering, manufacturing, and quality.
In the Quality domain, the standards and guidelines help the user by suggesting best practices and the optimal path. We can include approaches like APQP (Advanced product quality planning) and PPAP (Production Part Approval Process), which ensure the project quality is monitored and approved in alignment with respective milestones. By associating checklists under a Q-Gate or Milestone, the quality manager ensures that quality targets are met for all deliverables of each domain. The checklists are following common industry standards of Advance Product Quality Planning. All needed tasks are characterized as a list of closed questions that can be answered with comments and attached evidence to record implementation of the respective area, with a useful rating (RYG).
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is an essential part of Quality Planning. FMEA is an advanced tool to identify and mitigate risks from potential failures in the virtual product to avoid potential costly defects during the lifecycle of the real product. According to risk analysis principles, it is known that risks can be eliminated, mitigated, or accepted. The Control Plan is an additional toolset that helps control critical elements during the manufacturing processes, where the potential risk could not be fully mitigated but controlled systematically to identify defective parts.
Leveraging on a strong planning stage, it is possible to make sure requirements are met while providing extensive transparency for all deliverables and move forward to the next stages with confidence. The systematic approach to Quality Planning, especially when supported by the tools offered on the collaboration platform of Teamcenter, helps optimize teamwork, shorten development time, increase product quality and improve customer satisfaction.
[embeddoc url=”https://plmes.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Siemens-SW-Opcenter-APS-helps-consumer-packaged-goods-manufacturers-exceed-goals-Infographic_tcm27-92192.pdf”]
Discover more about Quality Planning today.
Don’t hesitate to contact Thanh for advice on automation solutions for CAD / CAM / CAE / PLM / ERP / IT systems exclusively for SMEs.
Luu Phan Thanh (Tyler) Solutions Consultant at PLM Ecosystem Mobile +84 976 099 099
Web www.plmes.io Email tyler.luu@plmes.io